Selected aspects of sexuality in pregnant women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Sexuality, being a vital aspect of life, encompasses its biological, psychological, and emotional spheres.A successful sex life facilitates the proper functioning of the relationship.Sexual drive and the form of this activity are frequently subjected to changes during pregnancy.A normal pregnancy is not a contraindication to sexual intercourse.Sexual contact has a positive impact on the course of pregnancy by improving the well-being of the pregnant woman.Aim of the study was to assess correlations between selected socio-demographic factors and sexual behaviour of pregnant women. Material and methods:The study was conducted in a group of 150 pregnant women in the period from January 2021 to April 2021.Method used for this study was a diagnostic survey, and the tool used was the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).In addition, an original questionnaire was also used.Results: Place of residence, level of education, and marital status did not significantly affect the quality of the respondents' sex life (p > 0.05).Younger respondents more often experienced ailments and pain during the sexual act than women over 30 years of age (p = 0.006).The obstetric history of the respondents had no impact on their satisfaction with sex life (p = 0.715).The parity of the respondents did not mark any significant differences between the frequency of intercourse in trimesters: I (p = 0.206), II (p = 0.855), and III (p = 0.552).The subjects in high-risk pregnancy declared higher satisfaction with sex life (p < 0.001).They also rated the lubrication domain worse (p = 0.005) and felt less pain during intercourse (p < 0.001).Conclusions: While planning antenatal care, the patient's relationship with a partner shall also be considered with regard to the possibility of using various forms of sexual activity adapted to the course of pregnancy, its duration, and the well-being of the pregnant woman.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".