MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389401398 · doi:10.46292/sci23-1985397s

Poster (Health Services, Economics and Policy Change) ID 1985397

2023· article· en· W4389401398 on OpenAlexaff
Farnoosh Farahani, B. Catharine Craven

Bibliographic record

VenueTopics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical practice guidelines implementation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeliverableBest practiceProcess managementDocumentationMedicineService delivery frameworkQuality managementHealth careKnowledge managementBusinessService (business)MarketingEngineeringComputer sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The Spinal Cord Injury Implementation and Evaluation Quality Care Consortium (SCI-IEQCC) is a quality improvement initiative (began in 2019) with a mission to provide optimal and equitable rehabilitation services for all Canadians regardless of where they live, and to ensure the functional recovery, health and well-being for individuals living with spinal cord injury and disease (SCI/D). Objective To highlight the growing needs of an expanding multisite network and the importance of governance and organizational structures to support the execution of current deliverables while addressing emerging challenges. Design/Methods The SCI-IEQCC has a central team for network management. Administrators/leaders, clinicians with implementation science training, local site implementation teams, and individuals with lived experience comprise the SCI-IEQCC. Implementation and evaluation of indicators and best practices across 10 participating organizations requires: operational oversite; monitoring of project milestones; adherence to regulatory requirements; sustained data quality with linkage for analyses; report card dissemination; information sharing and network updates; strategic planning to map future directions; identification of priorities; and, meeting academic/funding deliverables. Results/Findings SCI-IEQCC has driven improvements in rehabilitation service delivery, performance, utilization of best practices, and increments in staff engagement, training, and knowledge exchange. SCI-IEQCC challenges are derived from the diversity of participating organizations, turnover in leaders, staff shortages, reducing variation in documentation and data management, and ensuring resource continuity. Conclusion The growing complexity of this multisite network necessitate innovative approaches to streamline processes across sites, ensure uniform adherence to regulatory requirements, disseminate innovations in informatics, and assure dedication to its mission and vision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9090.651

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.510
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTopics in Spinal Cord Injury RehabilitationSame topicClinical practice guidelines implementationFrench-language works237,207