Poster (Clinical/Best Practice Implementation) ID 1985003
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Sexual health is an important component of overall health. Yet, sexuality is often neglected in rehabilitation. Studies indicate that typically clinicians do not address the sexual health concerns of patients because of lack of adequate training, comfort, and knowledge in this area. Objectives The purpose of this initiative was to develop and implement an e-learning module to address the current gap in rehabilitation practice. Methods In 2021, an interdisciplinary team of rehab clinicians worked with an Instructional Designer based at Parkwood Institute to develop e-Learning modules aimed to introduce rehab teams to sexual health rehab and application to practice. The modules were launched at Parkwood Institute in January 2022 and were compulsory education for all rehabilitation staff in Spinal Cord, Acquired Brain Injury and Stroke programs. They were subsequently launched more broadly at Vancouver Coastal Health in March 2022. Surveys were conducted to assess the impact of the modules on clinical application. Results To date,186/209 (89%) of rehabilitation staff at Parkwood Institute and a total of 55 clinicians from Vancouver Coastal Health have completed the modules. Preliminary results show improvement in confidence, knowledge, and ability to address the sexual health needs of rehabilitation patients. Conclusions The e-Learning modules help fill the current practice gap and facilitate sustainability of sexual health practice in clinical settings. Accessible educational opportunities such as the e-modules are valuable tools in enhancing self-efficacy of staff when addressing sexual health concerns of patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".