MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389427175 · doi:10.21083/ajote.v12i2.7582

Editorial Comment

2023· editorial· en· W4389427175 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Femi J. Kolapo, Sibonokuhle Ndlovu, Phefumula Nyoni

Bibliographic record

VenueAfrican Journal of Teacher Education · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican cultural and philosophical studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Special Issue is organized around the theme of "transition into a new African university in the Global South in the 21st Century" to reflect on historical trajectories, contemporary challenges, and future prospects of African higher education systems.The special issue is a product of an open call that targeted a wide range of scholars with diverse experiences and viewpoints.Incorporating diverse perspectives from various conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and empirical aspects of higher education transformation, this special issue presents a collection of scholarly papers that are both grounded in empirical evidence and are conceptually rigorous.The papers featured in this special issue offer thought-provoking perspectives and inspire critical debate on the issue of the future of African higher education.The papers have been arranged into four sub-thematic areas, namely, (i) Experiences and emerging practices within the African university, (ii) Barriers and transformation (iii) Transitioning to the new African university, and (iv) The future of the new African university. (i) Experiences and Emerging Practices within African UniversitiesThis sub-theme explores the emerging trends in African higher education systems that present both challenges and opportunities.This is with particular emphasis and relevance to students' epistemic access and success.It delves into the emergence of plurilingual practices which

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAfrican Journal of Teacher EducationSame topicAfrican cultural and philosophical studiesFrench-language works237,207