White matter hyperintensity burden and functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients after mechanical thrombectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The influence of white matter hyperintensity (WMH) on clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine whether WMH burden is associated with clinical outcomes in AIS patients after MT. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 03 September 2023. The registration number for PROSPERO is CRD42022340568. Studies reporting an association between the burden of WMH in AIS patients and clinical outcomes after MT were included in the meta-analysis. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Additionally, the presence of imprecise-study effects was evaluated using Egger's test and funnel plot. Fifteen studies with 3,456 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. Among AIS patients who underwent MT, moderate/severe WMH had higher odds of 90-day unfavorable functional outcomes (odds ratio [OR] 2.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.14-3.44; I2=0.0%; 95%CI 0.0%-42.7%), 90-day mortality (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.45-2.60; I2=19.5%; 95%CI 0.0%-65.2%) and futile recanalization (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.42-6.28; I2=69.7%; 95%CI 0.0%-91.0%) compared with none/mild WMH. However, the two groups had no significant difference in successful recanalization, symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation, and hemorrhagic transformation. A subset analysis of patients from 3 articles showed that WMH volume was not significantly associated with these outcomes. A notable limitation is that this meta-analysis lacks direct adjustment for imbalances in important baseline covariates. Patients with moderate/severe WMH on baseline imaging are associated with substantially increased odds of 90-day unfavorable outcomes, futile recanalization, and 90-day mortality after MT. This association suggests that moderate/severe WMH may contribute to the prediction of clinical outcomes in AIS patients after MT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".