Resolution of <i>trans</i>‐1,2‐cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid containing two carboxylic groups by forming diastereomeric salts based on feeding molar ratio control
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To investigate the thermodynamic and molecular self-assembly mechanism of trans-1,2-cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid containing two carboxylic acid groups in the chiral resolution process, (S)-phenylethylamine was used as the chiral resolving agent. Two stoichiometric salts were formed when the raw materials were fed at different molar ratios: cyclohexane dicarboxylate monophenylethylamine salt and cyclohexane dicarboxylate diphenylethylamine salt. When the molar ratio of the (S)-phenylethylamine to trans-1,2-cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid was less than 3:1, trans-(1S,2S)-cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid was obtained with 97 e.e% purity. But when the molar ratio exceeded 3:1, the product was the racemic trans-(1,2)-cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid. In addition, single crystal structures of more soluble mono-salt, less soluble mono-salt, and less soluble di-salt were obtained. The weak intermolecular interactions and the way of the molecules packing in the crystals were analyzed. The hydrogen bond was stronger in the less soluble salt than that in the more soluble salt. And a "lock-and-key" structure in the hydrophobic layers makes it more tightly packed through the van der Waals interaction, which is responsible for the stability of less soluble salts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".