MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389455083 · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2023.12.001

The Canadian Women’s Heart Health Alliance ATLAS on the Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Women — Chapter 9: Summary of Current Status, Challenges, Opportunities, and Recommendations

2023· review· en· W4389455083 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Sharon L. Mulvagh, Tracey J. F. Colella, Martha Gulati, Rebecca Crosier, Saleema Allana, Varinder K. Randhawa, Jill Bruneau, Christine Pacheco, Shahin Jaffer, Lisa M. Cotie, Emma Mensour, Marie‐Annick Clavel, Braeden Hill, Amy A. Kirkham, Heather J.A. Foulds, Kiera Liblik, Andrea Van Damme, Sherry L. Grace, Karen Bouchard, Heather Tulloch, Helen Mary Robert, April Pike, Jamie L. Benham, Nicole L. Tegg, Nazli Parast, Najah Adreak, Laurie‐Anne Boivin‐Proulx, Monica Parry, Zoya Gomes, Hope Sarfi, Chinelo Iwegim, Harriette G.C. Van Spall, Kara Nerenberg, Stephen P. Wright, Jayneel Limbachia, Kerri‐Anne Mullen, Colleen M. Norris

Bibliographic record

VenueCJC Open · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityImpactPopulation Health Research InstituteUniversity of CalgaryYork UniversityUniversity Health NetworkQueen's UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaFraser HealthUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversité de MontréalMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of TorontoWestern UniversityToronto Rehabilitation InstituteDalhousie UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUniversity of OttawaUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsEpidemiologyAllianceMedicineCardiovascular healthDiseaseGerontologyIntensive care medicinePolitical sciencePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This final chapter of the Canadian Women's Heart Health Alliance "ATLAS on the Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Women" presents ATLAS highlights from the perspective of current status, challenges, and opportunities in cardiovascular care for women. We conclude with 12 specific recommendations for actionable next steps to further the existing progress that has been made in addressing these knowledge gaps by tackling the remaining outstanding disparities in women's cardiovascular care, with the goal to improve outcomes for women in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.268
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCJC OpenSame topicCardiovascular Issues in PregnancyFrench-language works237,207