A finite element-convolutional neural network model (FE-CNN) for stress field analysis around arbitrary inclusions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study presents a data-driven finite element-machine learning surrogate model for predicting the end-to-end full-field stress distribution and stress concentration around an arbitrary-shaped inclusion. This is important because the model’s capacity to handle large datasets, consider variations in size and shape, and accurately replicate stress fields makes it a valuable tool for studying how inclusion characteristics affect material performance. An automatized dataset generation method using finite element simulation is proposed, validated, and used for attaining a dataset with one thousand inclusion shapes motivated by experimental observations and their corresponding spatially-varying stress distributions. A U-Net-based convolutional neural network (CNN) is trained using the dataset, and its performance is evaluated through quantitative and qualitative comparisons. The dataset, consisting of these stress data arrays, is directly fed into the CNN model for training and evaluation. This approach bypasses the need for converting the stress data into image format, allowing for a more direct and efficient input representation for the CNN. The model was evaluated through a series of sensitivity analyses, focusing on the impact of dataset size and model resolution on accuracy and performance. The results demonstrated that increasing the dataset size significantly improved the model’s prediction accuracy, as indicated by the correlation values. Additionally, the investigation into the effect of model resolution revealed that higher resolutions led to better stress field predictions and reduced error. Overall, the surrogate model proved effective in accurately predicting the effective stress concentration in inclusions, showcasing its potential in practical applications requiring stress analysis such as structural engineering, material design, failure analysis, and multi-scale modeling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it