MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389459444 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2023.3338214

Self-Contained Dual-Input Interferometric Receiver for Paralleled-Multichannel Wireless Systems

2023· article· en· W4389459444 on OpenAlexafffund
Jie Deng, Pascal Burasa, Ke Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDemodulationElectronic engineeringComputer scienceMulti-band deviceWirelessDual-polarization interferometryQuadrature amplitude modulationModulation (music)Channel (broadcasting)EngineeringBit error rateTelecommunicationsAntenna (radio)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a self-contained dual-input receiver architecture based on the interferometric technique is proposed and demonstrated for the first time for paralleled-multichannel wireless systems. Different from conventional counterparts, the proposed receiver consists of dual-input RF channel paths, and only one sole hardware is used to realize frequency translation, i.e., the conversion to intermediate frequency (IF) band. Demodulated IF signals can be extracted from two output ports instead of four ports in legacy multiport systems, thereby further reducing circuit complexity, size, cost, and power consumption. A mathematical model of the receiver architecture is formulated and applied to examine its modes of operation. For the proof of concept, a dual-band and dual-polarized prototype RX frontend is designed and fabricated to validate the proposed architecture. The transmission and demodulation of multiple digital modulation signals including QPSK, 16-QAM, 32-QAM, and 64-QAM are successfully demonstrated experimentally. Those measured results confirm that the proposed receiver architecture achieves good and desired performances. Based on the proposed self-contained dual-input receiver architecture, a multiband and multifunction polarization-diversified wireless system featuring compact size, low-cost, and low-power consumption suitable for 5G, 6G, and beyond can be realized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207