MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389488803 · doi:10.1063/5.0176166

Investigation on spontaneous liquid–liquid imbibition in capillaries with varying axial geometries using lattice Boltzmann method

2023· article· en· W4389488803 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsImbibitionPhysicsCapillary actionMechanicsContact angleLattice Boltzmann methodsWettingViscosityGeometryCapillary numberClassical mechanicsThermodynamicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spontaneous liquid–liquid imbibition in capillaries with irregular axial geometries is common in the petroleum industry. Monitoring the real-time dynamic contact angle (DCA) of the meniscus is crucial during such processes. In this work, we extend the Bell–Cameron–Lucas–Washburn (BCLW) equation by considering the axial shape of the capillaries, inertial force, and non-wetting fluid viscosity. We also develop a cascaded multi-component Shan–Chen lattice Boltzmann method (CLBM) with a modified mass-conservative curved boundary scheme to accurately simulate imbibition processes in sinusoidal capillaries. The results indicate that the DCA is highly sensitive to variations in the axial geometry of the capillary during imbibition, displaying a periodic time evolution pattern. When the axial geometry diverges, the DCA increases, and when it converges, the DCA decreases. The viscosity ratio affects the imbibition velocity, controlling the evolution period and extreme values of the DCA. A critical contact angle exists for a fixed capillary axial geometry and viscosity ratio. Continuous spontaneous imbibition occurs if the static contact angle is smaller than this critical value. However, if it exceeds this threshold, imbibition ceases within regions where axial geometry divergence. Moreover, we noticed a discrepancy in imbibition lengths predicted by the extended BCLW equation that ignores the DCA compared to those computed through the CLBM. To address this issue, we employed CLBM to monitor the DCA in real time and used the gathered data to refine the extended BCLW equation. As a result, the prediction of imbibition lengths by the extended BCLW equation for coupling the DCA became more accurate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it