MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389506910 · doi:10.37609/akya.2884

İktisadi Düşünürler Bilinmeyen Yaşamlar, Yaşayan Teoriler

2023· book· tr· W4389506910 on OpenAlexaff
İsmail Güneş, Melek Akdoğan Gedik

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languagetr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTurkish Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

İktisadi Düşünürler: Bilinmeyen Yaşamlar, Yaşayan Teoriler kitabı, İsmail Güneş ve Melek Akdoğan Gedik tarafından yazılmıştır. Bu kitap, iktisadi düşünürlerin yaşamlarını ve teorilerini ele almaktadır. Yazarlar, bilimsel bilginin paylaşılması ve nesilden nesile aktarılmasının önemine vurgu yapmaktadır. İktisat biliminin kurucusu kabul edilen Adam Smith'in çalışmalarının, Ricardo ve Marx gibi düşünürler üzerindeki etkisine değinilmektedir. Ayrıca, bilim insanlarının gelişim sürecinde etkili olan faktörlerin de önemi vurgulanmaktadır. Kitap, iktisadi düşünürlerin teorilerini ve yaşamlarını anlamak isteyen okuyucular için önemli bir kaynak niteliği taşımaktadır. Economists: Unknown Lives, Living Theories is a book written by Ismail Güneş and Melek Akdoğan Gedik. This book examines the lives and theories of economic thinkers. The authors emphasize the importance of sharing and transmitting scientific knowledge from generation to generation. The influence of Adam Smith, considered the founder of economics, on thinkers like Ricardo and Marx is also discussed. Additionally, the importance of factors that influence the development process of scientists is emphasized. The book serves as an important source for readers who want to understand the theories and lives of economic thinkers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0820.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTurkish Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207