The management and clinical outcomes of pregnancies in women with urea cycle disorders: A review of the literature and results of an international survey
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An increasing number of women with urea cycle disorders (UCDs) are reaching child-bearing age and becoming pregnant. Improved diagnostics and increased awareness of inherited metabolic diseases has also led to more previously undetected women being diagnosed with a UCD during or shortly after pregnancy. Pregnancy increases the risk of acute metabolic decompensation with hyperammonemia-which can occur in any trimester, and/or the postpartum period, and may lead to encephalopathy, psychosis, coma, and even death, if not diagnosed promptly and treated appropriately. There are also (theoretical) concerns that a maternal UCD, or its treatment, may cause potential risks for the unborn child. Currently evidence on management and outcome of pregnancies in UCDs is limited to case reports and there are no clear guidelines. In order to inform management and investigate outcomes of pregnancies in women with a UCD, we performed a retrospective review of published cases and analyzed data collected from an international online survey. We conclude that, although risk during the intra- and postpartum period exists, multidisciplinary management by an experienced team and a prospective plan usually result in successful pregnancy, labor, delivery, and postpartum period. No deaths were reported in mothers managed accordingly. With the exception of male neonates with Ornithine Transcarbamylase deficiency, the clinical outcome of children born to mothers with UCDs appears positive, although follow-up is limited. The outcome for women presenting with a first acute metabolic decompensation during pregnancy or postpartum is less favorable. Deaths were associated with diagnostic delay/late management of hyperammonemia in previously undiagnosed women.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".