MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389510032 · doi:10.1049/cvi2.12260

Deep network with double reuses and convolutional shortcuts

2023· article· en· W4389510032 on OpenAlexaff
Qian Liu, Cunbao Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Computer Vision · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkFeature (linguistics)ReuseBenchmark (surveying)Convolutional codeArtificial intelligencePascal (unit)Convolution (computer science)Pattern recognition (psychology)Deep learningAlgorithmDecoding methodsArtificial neural networkEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The authors design a novel convolutional network architecture, that is, deep network with double reuses and convolutional shortcuts, in which new compressed reuse units are presented. Compressed reuse units combine the reused features from the first 3 × 3 convolutional layer and the features from the last 3 × 3 convolutional layer to produce new feature maps in the current compressed reuse unit, simultaneously reuse the feature maps from all previous compressed reuse units to generate a shortcut by an 1 × 1 convolution, and then concatenate these new maps and this shortcut as the input to next compressed reuse unit. Deep network with double reuses and convolutional shortcuts uses the feature reuse concatenation from all compressed reuse units as the final features for classification. In deep network with double reuses and convolutional shortcuts, the inner‐ and outer‐unit feature reuses and the convolutional shortcut compressed from the previous outer‐unit feature reuses can alleviate the vanishing‐gradient problem by strengthening the forward feature propagation inside and outside the units, improve the effectiveness of features and reduce calculation cost. Experimental results on CIFAR‐10, CIFAR‐100, ImageNet ILSVRC 2012, Pascal VOC2007 and MS COCO benchmark databases demonstrate the effectiveness of authors’ architecture for object recognition and detection, as compared with the state‐of‐the‐art.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Computer VisionSame topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207