MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389511977 · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111389

Spider and vascular plant assemblages in subarctic peat bogs are complementary ecological indicators of variation in local and landscape factors

2023· article· en· W4389511977 on OpenAlexaff
Axel Hacala, Manuel Salgueiro-Simon, Allison Bain, Dominique Marguerie, Julien Pétillon

Bibliographic record

VenueEcological Indicators · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersOffice Français de la BiodiversitéAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsEcologyBogPeatAlpha diversityBeta diversityVascular plantBiodiversityBiological dispersalGamma diversityAbundance (ecology)BiologyRelative species abundanceIndicator speciesSubarctic climateHabitatSpecies richnessPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite their specific biodiversity and the ecosystem services they furnish, peat bogs remain poorly understood, especially in terms of their responses to changes at multiple spatial scales. Many subarctic peat systems face acute risks, due to current global change. In this study, using a multi-metric approach, we assessed the relative value of plants and spiders as ecological indicators in contrasted peat bogs of a French archipelago (St. Pierre-et-Miquelon), located in the North Atlantic. In 2021, pitfall trapping and suction sampling collected spiders while phytosociological relevés were used to document vascular plants. A total of 69 species of spiders and 38 species of vascular plants were identified, and both taxonomic (TD) and functional (FD, based on traits related to dispersal, size and ecosystem functioning) diversity were then estimated for three levels of species relative abundance (Hill numbers q = 0, 1 and 2) using the iNEXT 3D package for alpha diversity as well as iNEXT beta3D for beta diversity. As expected, patterns of TD and FD were highly correlated for each Hill number, but also between Hill numbers for spiders, indicating a surprisingly low effect of species abundance on (spider) diversity patterns. On the contrary, differences between sites were more visible for plants species when species coverage was considered (q = 1 and q = 2), for both TD and FD, and for alpha and beta diversity. RLQ and Fourth corner analyses indicated differences based on functional traits between sites which were significantly associated with relationships between dispersal modes and mostly local factors for plant assemblages. Finally, variance partitioning on assemblage composition showed the importance of an interaction between local and landscape factors for both plants and spiders, with a relatively high importance of local factors alone for plants. Our study thus revealed the high complementary of spider vs. plant assemblage-based metrics as indicators of changing local conditions in peat bogs, confirming these both experience rapid change in subarctic climates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcological IndicatorsSame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207