Acantholytic squamous cell carcinoma mimicking epithelioid angiosarcoma: A diagnostic challenge by cytology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most common malignancy of the head and neck region. Most cases present little diagnostic difficulty on fine needle aspiration (FNA), but unusual variants can be problematic. The authors report a case of the acantholytic SCC of the oral cavity in a 36-year-old male. The FNA showed hypercellularity, with malignant cells arranged in isolation, loosely cohesive groups and a linear configuration. Such cells were round to elongated, with vesicular nuclei and prominent nucleoli. Cells possessed occasional intracytoplasmic vacuoles, misinterpreted on FNA to be vasoformative features as seen in malignant endothelial cells. The cytologic diagnosis was "positive for malignancy, suggestive of angiosarcoma". A total excision was performed and by histology, the tumor was diagnosed as acantholytic SCC. The malignant cells were positive by immunostaining for AE1/AE3, p40, p63 and vimentin, but negative for CD31, CD34 and ERG. The intracytoplasmic vacuoles were PAS- and mucin-negative and negative for the above antibodies. Testing for HPV (molecular and p16 immunostaining) was negative. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges on cytology when malignant acantholytic squamous cells show intracytoplasmic vacuoles, and stresses how immunohistochemistry is important for distinguishing acantholytic SCC from other mimics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".