A Low-Power High Input Range PPG Readout Amplifier with a Current Buffer Input<sup>*</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents ultra-low power photoplethysmography (PPG) readout circuits. The proposed system architecture uses a current buffer between the photodiode (PD) and the transimpedance amplifier (TIA) to isolate the large parasitic capacitance of the PD leading to improves the power consumption of the TIA. A class AB topology is exploited at the output of the amplifier, which allows for increased drive capability without the use of auxiliary circuits. The maximum input current range of the TIA is 160 µA, so the large DC current of the input signal does not saturate the circuit. In the LED driver circuit, by varying the duty cycle of a pulse wave modulation (PWM) signal, the ON and OFF times of the circuits. The amplifier and LED driver are manufactured in the 130 nm TSMC CMOS process. The power consumption of the circuits with a duty cycle of 1% is 3.28 µW (at VDD = 1.2V).Clinical Relevance- Vital signs are becoming a very important research topic due to the recent prevalence of COVID-19 and other respiratory diseases. This research aims to develop and interface circuits to monitor vital signs including blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate to study respiratory disease, drug safety, and efficacy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".