Quantum Ray Marching: Reformulating Light Transport for Quantum Computers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of quantum computers in computer graphics has gained interest in recent years, especially for the application to rendering. The current state of the art in quantum rendering relies on Grover’s search for finding ray intersections in for M primitives. This quantum approach is faster than the naive approach of O(M) but slower than O(log M) of modern ray tracing with an acceleration data structure. Furthermore, this quantum ray tracing method is fundamentally limited to casting one ray at a time, leaving quantum rendering scales for the number of rays the same as non-quantum algorithms. We present a new quantum rendering method, quantum ray marching, based on the reformulation of ray marching as a quantum random walk. Our work is the first complete quantum rendering pipeline capable of light transport simulation and remains asymptotically faster than non-quantum counterparts. Our quantum ray marching can trace an exponential number of paths with polynomial cost, and it leverages quantum numerical integration to converge in O(1/N) for N estimates as opposed to non-quantum . These properties led to first quantum rendering that is asymptotically faster than non-quantum Monte Carlo rendering. We numerically tested our algorithm by rendering 2D and 3D scenes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".