MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Meta-DAMS: Delay-Aware Multipath Scheduler using Hybrid Meta Reinforcement Learning

2023· article· en· W4389544347 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Sepahi, Lin Cai, Wenjun Yang, Jianping Pan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNetwork schedulerMultipath propagationNetwork packetReinforcement learningEmulationScheduling (production processes)Transmission delayReal-time computingPacket lossComputer networkDistributed computingProcessing delayChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The deployment of multipath transport protocols in the mobile environment can enhance the performance of delay-sensitive applications by enabling the simultaneous use of several network paths, resulting in faster data transmission. However, due to the heterogeneity of network paths, packets may not arrive on time or in order, affecting the performance of delay-sensitive applications. Therefore, a well-designed multipath scheduler is important to distribute data packets efficiently to guarantee the per-packet delay requirement. In this paper, we propose Meta-DAMS, a delay-aware learning-based multipath scheduler, aiming to ensure that end-to-end delay is below a predefined threshold for delay-sensitive applications. We introduce a hybrid meta reinforcement learning (meta-RL) architecture for Meta-DAMS in which offline meta-RL and online meta-RL are used to learn the optimal scheduling policy quickly and accurately in response to highly dynamic network conditions. Based on trace-driven emulation experiments, we demonstrate that Meta-DAMS surpasses state-of-the-art MP schedulers, ensuring a delay of 50 ms or less for 98% of packets after sufficient operational episodes, compared to the 83% achieved by existing MP schedulers. Even in initial operational episodes, Meta-DAMS maintains its superiority, guaranteeing 94% of packets with a delay of 50 ms or less, while the performance of the DQN-based MPQUIC scheduler drops to 72%. Meta-DAMS exhibits nearly triple the efficiency in terms of runtime compared to the DQN-based MPQUIC scheduler across varying episode numbers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207