MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Age of Information Minimization for Short-Packet Communications RSMA in Satellite-based IoT

2023· article· en· W4389544890 on OpenAlexaff
Qingqing Yan, Jian Jiao, Yasong Wang, Lirong An, Rongxing Lu, Qinyu Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlock Error RateComputer scienceTelecommunications linkNetwork packetRician fadingMinificationComputer networkBlock (permutation group theory)Mathematical optimizationFadingAlgorithmReal-time computingChannel (broadcasting)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to minimize the age of information (AoI) of downlink rate-splitting multiple access (RSMA) in satellite-based Internet of Things (S-IoT) network over shadowed-Rician fading channels, where a satellite multicasts with multiple user equipments (UEs) by timely transmitting short-packet status updates. First, the expressions for block error rate (BLER) and average AoI (AAoI) are derived in a closed-form for short-packet communications with finite blocklength bound. Then, we formulate an AAoI minimization problem based on the theoretical derivations for the downlink RSMA S-IoT network, and design an age-optimal stationary power allocation (ASPA) scheme to solve the problem by utilizing the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. We further propose an age-optimal dynamic power allocation (ADPA) scheme based on the Markov decision process (MDP), and solve it by two deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithms. Monte Carlo simulations verify the accuracy of our derivations of BLER and AAoI, and also show that our ADPA scheme outperforms the related schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAge of Information OptimizationFrench-language works237,207