Harnessing Online Knowledge Transfer for Enhanced Search and Rescue Decisions via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the rapidly evolving domain of the Internet of Things (IoT), devices play an instrumental role in high-stakes scenarios like search and rescue (SAR) operations. Traditional decision-making processes within SAR missions often struggle to cope with the dynamic and unpredictable nature of such environments, leading to inefficiencies and delayed responses. This paper aims to explore the potential of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) to improve the decision-making process within SAR operations underpinned by IoT. Functional, current methods are limited by their static decision frameworks and inability to adapt in real time to the chaotic variables present in SAR situations. We introduced a novel MARL framework and compared its performance against benchmark strategies, specifically the multi-agent deep deterministic policy gradient (MADDPG) approach. Uniquely enhanced by online knowledge transfer, the framework leverages the capabilities of the deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) method. The preliminary findings underscore the proposed framework’s superior efficiency and speed in SAR contexts. Our research highlights MARL’s transformative potential, positing it as a groundbreaking strategy for IoT-based decision making in high-pressure SAR environments with suggestions for further studies in varied real-world scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".