MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389562094 · doi:10.7185/gold2023.18019

Ongoing Activities for the Planned Canadian OSIRIS-REx Sample Curation Facility

2023· article· en· W4389562094 on OpenAlexaffabout
P. J. A. Hill, Caroline‐Emmanuelle Morisset, T. Haltigin, Stéphane Routhier, Rémy Grenier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicResearch Data Management Practices
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsirisSample (material)Computer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

the OSIRIS-REx mission collected a sample from the asteroid Bennu, which will be delivered to Earth on September 24, 2023 [1].The study of the sample will make it possible to tackle some of the fundamental questions about the early composition and evolution of the solar system.Through Canada's contribution of the OSIRIS-REx Laser Altimeter (OLA) instrument [2], Canada will receive 4% of the returned Bennu sample.The Canadian Space Agency (CSA) is currently planning its Curation Facility, the first laboratory of its kind in Canada.The facility will allow for the storage and manipulation of the sample under a curation-grade nitrogen atmosphere preventing contamination and degradation from the terrestrial environment.The CSA has also begun developing its cleaning procedures for all stainless steel, glass, and Teflon tools that would be used to manipulate the sample.In tandem, contamination monitoring protocols are being developed to ensure that the contamination of the sample is minimal and an archive of contamination knowledge is kept.Sub-samples will be available for loans to the scientific community and will be prepared using a variety of techniques (e.g., pristine grains, thick and thin sections, polished grain-mounts, etc.).Information collected through early observations and subsequent studies will be catalogued to record both the analytical history and the growing knowledge of the sample.The catalogue will facilitate sample requests from researchers from around the world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0060.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0540.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.172
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicResearch Data Management PracticesFrench-language works237,207