MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389563232 · doi:10.7185/gold2023.16252

Crash, bang, crustal nuclei?

2023· article· it· W4389563232 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christopher L. Kirkland, Tim Johnson, Michael Brown, Phil J. Sutton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrashAstrobiologyComputer sciencePhysicsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The early Archean Earth was very different to our modern planet, arguably more akin to present day Venus, with, for some period, a stagnant-, squishy-, sluggish lid, and a high impact flux. Two non-mutually exclusive scenarios exist to produce crustal nuclei on our young planet: A/ bottom-up melting produced in plumes or some other return of fractionated products of greenstone drips; and B/ top-down melts produced via impacts. Zircons from the oldest dated felsic crust, the Idiwhaa gneiss of the Acasta Gneiss Complex, Canada have been used to provide important constraints on early Earth's felsic crust. However, these zircon grains have been affected by multiple stages of overprinting metamorphism, which renders understanding of primary versus secondary processes challenging. Ion imaging of these zircon grains helps to better understand their primary isotopic signatures. Although ion images reveal pervasive recrystallization fronts, pockets of amorphous, but nonetheless concordant, c. 4.0 Ga zircon have escaped post-magmatic fluid-mediated modification. Primary oxygen isotope signatures from these ancient zircon cores preserve two components—one at the heavy end of mantle values and another isotopically lighter than mantle. The isotopically-light component demands interaction with fluids either directly, or via partial melting of low-?18O rocks that themselves had previously undergone high-temperature hydrothermal alteration by surface waters. Globally, a similar secular pattern with oscillations between normal and non-normal distributions of zircon oxygen isotopes supports an interpretation of periodic enhanced surficial melting. A c. 190 Ma periodicity of asymmetric oxygen isotope distributions corresponds to predicted higher impact flux, based on an astronomical galactic arm solar system transit model. Furthermore, this periodicity correlates with step changes in zircon Hf isotopes from most Archean Cratons, consistent with enhanced rates of crust production and reworking during both entry into and exit from the galactic spiral arms. A similar periodicity in hypervelocity impact craters on the more modern Earth gives credence to the interpretation that episodic shallow melting from impacts modified the lithosphere and spawned Earth’s early crustal nuclei during the voyage of the solar system through the Milk Way.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1090.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicearthquake and tectonic studies→French-language works237,207→