Long term peripheral AAV9-SMN gene therapy promotes survival in a mouse model of spinal muscular atrophy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neuromuscular disease characterized by motor neuron loss and skeletal muscle atrophy. SMA is caused by the loss of the SMN1 gene and low SMN protein levels. Current SMA therapies work by increasing SMN protein in the body. Although SMA is regarded as a motor neuron disorder, growing evidence shows that several peripheral organs contribute to SMA pathology. A gene therapy treatment, onasemnogene abeparvovec, is being explored in clinical trials via both systemic and central nervous system (CNS) specific delivery, but the ideal route of delivery as well as the long-term effectiveness is unclear. To investigate the impact of gene therapy long term, we assessed SMA mice at 6 months after treatment of either intravenous (IV) or intracerebroventricular (ICV) delivery of scAAV9-cba-SMN. Interestingly, we observed that SMN protein levels were restored in the peripheral tissues but not in the spinal cord at 6 months of age. However, ICV injections provided better motor neuron and motor function protection than IV injection, while IV-injected mice demonstrated better protection of neuromuscular junctions and muscle fiber size. Surprisingly, both delivery routes resulted in an equal rescue on survival, weight, and liver and pancreatic defects. These results demonstrate that continued peripheral AAV9-SMN gene therapy is beneficial for disease improvement even in the absence of SMN restoration in the spinal cord.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".