FORMS AND METHODS OF PATRIOTIC EDUCATION FORMATION OF PRISONERS AND WAYS OF THEIR IMPLEMENTATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В статье рассматриваются проблемы формирования патриотического воспитания осужденных, находящихся в местах лишения свободы. Автор отмечает, что после «забвения» патриотической идеологии в 90-е гг. прошлого века, в первой четверти века нынешнего в России происходит рост национального самосознания, и патриотизм вернул себе важное место в системе социальных ценностей, что особенно востребовано в новых реалиях международных отношений и угроз безопасности России, исходящих от «коллективного Запада». В настоящее время патриотическому воспитанию граждан уделяется существенное внимание, однако уголовно-исполнительная система, к сожалению, остается в стороне от таких процессов. На необходимость дополнения воспитательной работы с осужденными патриотическим воспитанием неоднократно указывалось в пенитенциарной науке, однако в Концепции развития уголовно-исполнительной системы до 2030 года о патриотическом воспитании осужденных не сказано ни слова. Автор полагает, что в настоящее время востребованы действенные формы и методы формирования патриотического воспитания осужденных, находящихся в местах лишения свободы, исключающие формальность и шаблонный подход, рассматривающие особенности осужденных к лишению свободы как социальной прослойки, требующей специфического стимулирования. The article discusses the problems of forming patriotic education for prisoners. The author notes that after the «oblivion» of patriotic ideology in the 90s of the last century, in the first quarter of the current century in Russia there is a growth in national self-awareness, and patriotism has regained its important place in the system of social values, which is especially in demand in the new realities of international relations and threats to Russians security emanating from the «collective West». Currently, considerable regard is paid to the patriotic education of citizens, but the penal system, unfortunately, remains aloof from such processes. The need to supplement educational work with convicts with patriotic education has been repeatedly pointed out in penitentiary science, however, not a word is said about patriotic education of convicts in the «Concept of the development of the penal system until 2030». The author believes that effective forms and methods of forming patriotic education of prisoners in correctional institutions places are currently in demand, excluding formalism and a template approach, taking into account the specifics of those sentenced to imprisonment as a special social stratum requiring specific stimulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".