The Poetics of Framing, Performing Frames in the Visual Arts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This collection of essays investigates the question of the frame from various angles such as art history, literary studies, visual studies and intermediality. Located at the junction between the external and the internal space of the work of art, the frame deploys the extent of its power as it is about to make the work happen. It is understood as a process that takes place in the interaction between the work of art and the space exterior to it. It thus problematizes the connections between the work and its spatial environment and more largely its cultural and political/ideological implications. The collection gathers essays focusing on painting, photography, manuscript studies, and literature, and analyses works produced in Anglophone countries (from the British Isles to the United States, from Canada to Australia) from the Middle Ages to the present. Les articles de ce numéro abordent la question du cadre à partir de perspectives aussi diverses que celles de l’histoire de l’art, des études littéraires, des études visuelles et de l’intermédialité. Situé au point de jonction entre l’extérieur et l’intérieur, le cadre exprime pleinement son potentiel au moment où il fait advenir l’œuvre en tant qu’œuvre. Le cadre se comprend ici comme un processus qui s’accomplit lors de l’interaction entre l’œuvre et l’espace qui l’entoure. Le cadre problématise les liens entre une œuvre et son environnement spatial, et plus largement ses implications culturelles, politiques et idéologiques. Les articles rassemblés ici portent sur la peinture, la photographie, les manuscrits et la littérature, et analysent des œuvres produites dans les pays anglophones (des Îles Britanniques aux États-Unis, du Canada à l’Australie) du Moyen Âge à aujourd’hui.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".