MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389610323 · doi:10.1109/tie.2023.3337518

An Online Scanning Method to Detect the Output Characteristics of Photovoltaic Panels

2023· article· en· W4389610323 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Sangrody, Shamsodin Taheri

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemMaximum power point trackingInverterCapacitorMaximum power principlePower (physics)Solar micro-inverterInductorVoltageBoost converterEngineeringPoint (geometry)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes an online scanning technique to detect the output characteristics of a photovoltaic (PV) panel. This innovative technology, presented as a power electronic circuit, provides several advantages such as detecting the partial shading occurrence, estimating the global maximum power point, and noticing the malfunction of PV inverters. In addition, it can be used beside the maximum power point tracking algorithm to decrease its tracking time especially in uncertain climate conditions. The scanning procedure can be completed in two phases namely the right-hand side and the left-hand side scanning of the operating point. The proposed scanning method is conducted through applying a voltage across an inductor located between the PV panel and the terminal capacitor. This converter can be used in an online manner to scan the electrical characteristics of a PV system. Thus, contrary to the traditional methods, the scanning converter does not interfere the operation of PV system. Furthermore, the proposed method does not have detrimental impacts on the terminal electrolytic capacitor of the PV panel leading to a long lifespan of the PV inverter. In order to show the effectiveness of the proposed technology, simulated and experimental results are brought under different solar irradiation patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207