THREATS AND CONSERVATION SIGNIFICANCE OF CLIMBERS AT ARID LAND, KACHCHH, GUJARAT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kachchh district falls under the Arid Bio-geographic Zone of the country having distinct oristic and faunal composition due to its distinct climatic condition. Now in recent decades, the changing climatic conditions and several anthropogenic activities have led to the unknowingly loss of several plant species. Climbers are one among the unique oristic compositions of the dryland habitat of Kachchh which are distributed in all types of habitats. With the loss of many of the host species in their natural habitat, climbers are facing threats to their survival at present. Therefore, the study has been carried out to assess various threats on climbers, to mitigate and conserve the native climbers' species of this landscape. Threats on climber's species were made using the rapid threat assessment (RTA) technique. The survey observed different types of threats on climbers, including; habitat loss, intensive resource use, harvesting for food and medicine, infra-structure development, invasion, etc. Among the climber species of the district; Corallocarpus epigaeus, Ipomoea muricata, Tinospora cordifolia as the highest risk, while Bougainvillea spectabilis, Merremia aegyptia, Ipomoea pescaprae has the lowest risk. The study concluded that climbers are an ecologically important ora distributed in all habitats of the district and the intensity of threats was found to vary from species to species and also among the habitats of its distribution. Therefore, suitable conservation measures need to be adopted preferably for the species and habitats which are comparatively facing more threats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".