MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389616656 · doi:10.1161/jaha.123.029491

Hemodynamic Failure Staging With Blood Oxygenation Level–Dependent Cerebrovascular Reactivity and Acetazolamide‐Challenged ( <sup>15</sup> O‐)H <sub>2</sub> O‐Positron Emission Tomography Across Individual Cerebrovascular Territories

2023· article· en· W4389616656 on OpenAlexaff
Martina Sebök, Frank van der Wouden, Cäcilia Mader, Athina Pangalu, Valérie Treyer, Joseph A. Fisher, David J. Mikulis, Martin Hüllner, Luca Regli, Jorn Fierstra, Christiaan Hendrik Bas van Niftrik

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Heart Association · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersUniversität Zürich
KeywordsPositron emission tomographyMedicineAcetazolamideNuclear medicineEmission computed tomographyCerebral blood flowHemodynamicsCardiologyPerfusionCutoffRadiologyInternal medicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Staging of hemodynamic failure (HF) in symptomatic patients with cerebrovascular steno‐occlusive disease is required to assess the risk of ischemic stroke. Since the gold standard positron emission tomography‐based perfusion reserve is unsuitable as a routine clinical imaging tool, blood oxygenation level–dependent cerebrovascular reactivity (BOLD‐CVR) with CO 2 is a promising surrogate imaging approach. We investigated the accuracy of standardized BOLD‐CVR to classify the extent of HF. Methods and Results Patients with symptomatic unilateral cerebrovascular steno‐occlusive disease, who underwent both an acetazolamide challenge ( 15 O‐)H 2 O‐positron emission tomography and BOLD‐CVR examination, were included. HF staging of vascular territories was assessed using qualitative inspection of the positron emission tomography perfusion reserve images. The optimum BOLD‐CVR cutoff points between HF stages 0–1–2 were determined by comparing the quantitative BOLD‐CVR data to the qualitative ( 15 O‐)H 2 O‐positron emission tomography classification using the 3‐dimensional accuracy index to the randomly assigned training and test data sets with the following determination of a single cutoff for clinical application. In the 2‐case scenario, classifying data points as HF 0 or 1–2 and HF 0–1 or 2, BOLD‐CVR showed an accuracy of >0.7 for all vascular territories for HF 1 and HF 2 cutoff points. In particular, the middle cerebral artery territory had an accuracy of 0.79 for HF 1 and 0.83 for HF 2, whereas the anterior cerebral artery had an accuracy of 0.78 for HF 1 and 0.82 for HF 2. Conclusions Standardized and clinically accessible BOLD‐CVR examinations harbor sufficient data to provide specific cerebrovascular reactivity cutoff points for HF staging across individual vascular territories in symptomatic patients with unilateral cerebrovascular steno‐occlusive disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Heart AssociationSame topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesFrench-language works237,207