High aspect ratio silicon ring-shape micropillars fabricated by deep reactive ion etching with sacrificial structures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the fabrication of widely-spaced high aspect ratio ring-shape pillars (i.e. hollow pillars). Lateral etching of the pillars during deep reactive ion etching is challenging. To reduce this problem, we proposed adding sacrificial structures surrounding the pillars such that the lateral etching mainly occurs on the sacrificial structures. We designed two different kinds of sacrificial structures, one is circular ring structures surrounding the pillars, the other one is two half circle structures with two small gaps. Both sacrificial structures could help to fabricate pillars with vertical sidewalls. When the width of the sacrificial structures was well designed for a given etching condition, the sacrificial structures could be removed by ultrasonic agitation after the process with clean surface because they had been weakened by the lateral etching. Using this method, 2D widely-spaced ring-shape pillar array with 470 μm high pillars (diameter 200 μm, aspect ratio 2.35) and 370 μm deep holes (diameter 80 μm, aspect ratio 4.63) was fabricated simultaneously.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".