MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389631820 · doi:10.5787/51-3-1435

Die Affäre Patzig: Ein Kriegsverbrechen für das Kaiserreich?

2023· article· de· W4389631820 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tilman Dedering

Bibliographic record

VenueScientia Militaria South African Journal of Military Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean history and politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Van der Heyden's The Patzig affair.A war crime for the empire? is a richly illustrated study of the case of U-boat commandant Helmut Patzig, whose U-86 torpedoed the British hospital ship, Llandovery Castle, on 27 June 1918.U-boats were stealth weapons, and therefore of a dubious reputation.They could launch surprise attacks without being spotted, only to disappear quickly again after a successful kill.Submarine warfare therefore occurred in an ethically grey area that many contemporaries viewed with disdain, akin to another terrifying invention used in the Great War, namely poison gas.When the British naval blockade began to upset the German economy, the Germans declared in February 1915 that they would retaliate by conducting unrestricted submarine warfare around the British Isles.This resulted not only in serious losses of tonnage, which threatened to disrupt Britain's own economic lifeline, but also in German attacks on neutral vessels on the mere suspicion that they might transport military supplies.The torpedoing of the ocean liner Lusitania by a German U-boat on 7 May 1915 killed nearly 1 200 passengers, which confirmed the image of Germany as a ruthless belligerent that ignored the rules of 'civilised' warfare.The further escalation of submarine warfare in 1916 saw attacks on foreign vessels in British waters without any warning.These assaults were brought to a halt temporarily because American citizens were among the victims.At that stage, the German military leadership was concerned not to provoke the United States into entering the war.These endeavours of scaling tactics back to less jarring practices were short-lived, however, and in February 1917, Germany officially returned to unrestricted submarine warfare.The United States entered the war in April 1917 against the background of an increasingly pugnacious mood amongst the American public that was incited partly by the indiscriminate U-boat attacks.The decision to return to a more rules-based form of submarine warfare in October 1918 came too late to change Allied perceptions of entrenched German malice.More importantly, German U-boats proved to be powerless to prevent the arrival of American 'dough boys' on the Western battlefields, which precipitated the final defeat of the Kaiserreich.Patzig's ruthless actions against the British hospital ship, which was placed in the service of the Canadian forces, may be viewed in the context of an increasingly desperate mood in the German navy.The rules of 'civilised' combat -as much as all governments promised to respect them in peacetime -had been eroded quickly after the shooting

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientia Militaria South African Journal of Military StudiesSame topicEuropean history and politicsFrench-language works237,207