Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: This paper reviews previous attributions of the coinage, supports dates between 395 and 394 for it, and relates it to Agesilaus ii and the preparation of the fleet by the cities-allies of the Spartans, to which refers the legend ΣYN ( synteleia ). Iconography—Heracles drakontopnigon —supports the relation to Agesilaus, the Heraclid par excellence, while the Hecatomnus hoard reveals that all coinages on the Chian standard of the hoard are associated with the Spartan-Persian War (399–386 b.c.e.). Abstract: Cet article passe en revue les attributions précédentes de la monnaie ΣYN, argumente en faveur de dates entre 395 et 394 pour celle-ci, et relie cette monnaie à Agésilas ii et à la préparation d'une flotte par les cités alliées des Spartiates, à laquelle la légende ΣYN ( synteleia ) fait référence. L'iconographie — Héraclès drakontopnigon — soutient la relation avec Agésilas, l'Héraclide par excellence, tandis que le trésor d'Hécatomne révèle que toutes les monnaies appartenant au standard de Chios dans ce trésor sont associées à la guerre spartiato-perse (399-386 a. C.).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".