Indigenous Coinages in Palestine: Towards an Understanding of the Persian-Hellenistic Transitional Monetary Phase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: This paper surveys the minting authorities and royal mints of Palestine under the Achaemenids (ca 450–332 b.c.e.), Graeco-Macedonians (332–301 b.c.e.), and Ptolemies (301–198 b.c.e.) in order to address questions of continuity and change in the monetary administration of the southernmost regions of Coele-Syria. The transformation from minting authorities to royal mints between the periods of Persian and Hellenistic dominations is analyzed against the political reality of Palestine at the time. Abstract: Cet article passe en revue les autorités frappant monnaie et les ateliers royaux de frappe de monnaie en Palestine sous les Achéménides (332–301 a. C.) et sous les Ptolémées (301–198 a. C.) afin d'aborder les questions de continuité et de changement dans l'administration monétaire des régions australes de Cœlé-Syrie. Le passage d'un système où la frappe de monnaie est confiée à certaines autorités à un système où cette frappe est faite par des ateliers royaux, qui s'est produit entre les périodes à domination perse et hellénistique, est examiné sur le fond de la réalité politique de la Palestine à cette période.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".