Expression and DNA methylation of 20S proteasome subunits as prognostic and resistance markers in cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Proteasomes are involved in the maintenance of cellular protein homeostasis and the control of numerous cellular pathways. Single proteasome genes or subunits have been identified as important players in cancer development and progression without considering the proteasome as a multi-subunit protease. We here conduct a comprehensive pan-cancer analysis encompassing transcriptional, epigenetic, mutational landscapes, pathway enrichments, and survival outcomes linked to the 20S proteasome core complex. The impact of proteasome gene expression on patient survival exhibits a cancer-type dependent pattern. Escalated proteasome expression associates with elevated activation of oncogenic pathways, such as DNA repair, MYC- controlled gene networks, MTORC1 signaling, oxidative phosphorylation, as well as metabolic pathways including glycolysis and fatty acid metabolism. Vice versa, potential loss of function variants correlates with improved survival. The TCGA-derived outcomes are further supported by gene expression analysis of THP-1 cells. Our study reframes these subunits as an integrated functional ensemble, rather than separated subunits. Abstract Figure
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".