<i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> can use an alternative pathway to be internalized by osteoblasts in absence of β1 integrins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Staphylococcus aureus main internalization mechanism in osteoblasts relies on a tripartite interaction between bacterial fibronectin-binding proteins, extracellular matrix soluble fibronectin, and osteoblasts’ β1 integrins. Caveolins, and particularly caveolin-1, have shown to limit the plasma membrane microdomain mobility, and consequently reduce the uptake of S. aureus in keratinocytes. In this study, we aimed to deepen our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying S. aureus internalization in osteoblasts. Mechanistically, S. aureus internalization requires endosomal recycling β1 integrins as well as downstream effectors such as Src, Rac1, and PAK1. Surprisingly, in β1 integrin deficient osteoblasts, S. aureus internalization is restored when Caveolin-1 is absent and requires αvβ3/αvβ5 integrins as backup fibronectin receptors. Altogether, our data support that β1 integrins regulate the level of detergent-resistant membrane at the plasma membrane in a an endosomal and Caveolin-1 dependent manner. SUMMARY STATEMENT Staphylococcus aureus can be internalized by osteoblasts via a different mechanism than the main α5β1/fibronectin/fibronectin-binding protein that likely involves αvβ3 or αvβ5 integrin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".