MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Statistical Characterization of Position-Dependent Behavior Using Frequency-Aware B-Spline

2023· article· en· W4389665658 on OpenAlexaff
Yazan M. Al-Rawashdeh, Marcel Heertjes, Mohammad Al Janaideh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePosition (finance)Basis (linear algebra)Basis functionSineSpline (mechanical)ComputationB-splineJerkMotion controlMotion (physics)AlgorithmControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsMathematical analysisRobotEngineeringGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stretching the definition of the standard Sine profile allows building a generalized symmetric frequency-aware basis function that can be used to generate reference motion trajectories. Other profiles such as polynomials, sigmoid, and harmonic-based models can be equally used under the proposed technique. Despite being suitable at the level of any higher-order time derivative, in this study, the generic basis function is realized at the jerk level such that the generated signals adhere to the limitations of the driven motion system. Introducing suitable time shifts, replicas of basis functions can be obtained giving rise to B-spline like frequency-aware profiles that can be used to realize the actual motion under any desired kinematical constraints, which are neatly written to reduces the computation burden at the motion controller side. Utilizing mainly the frequency-aware B-spline profiles, frequency-dependent random walk motion is presented and used to collect information about the driven motion system to help in characterizing any position-dependent errors through the statistical means, i.e. Analysis of Variance, and Design of Experiments. This allows dividing the working space in which motion takes place into several spatial regions with preferred frequency contents. The effectiveness of these proposed profiles is shown through hardware experiments using a precision motion system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207