MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Development of a Time-of-Flight Neutron Emission Spectrometer for General Fusion’s Fusion Demonstration Program

2023· article· en· W4389666281 on OpenAlexaff
A. J. Radich, R. Underwood, F. Retière, K. Starosta, Myles Hildebrand, T. Eade, Hari Chohan, Sandra Barsky, Patrick Carle, Stephen Howard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityTRIUMFGeneral Fusion (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFusionSpectrometerFusion powerNeutronNuclear fusionNuclear physicsComputer sciencePhysicsNuclear engineeringEngineeringOpticsPlasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

General Fusion is developing a Magnetized Target Fusion approach that involves compressing an initial magnetically confined plasma inside a cavity formed in liquid metal. General Fusion has launched a Fusion Demonstration Program to design and construct a large scale, integrated prototype, being built at the Culham Centre for Fusion Energy in the United Kingdom. It is proposed to implement a highly segmented, time-of-flight Neutron Emission Spectrometer to measure the energy distribution of neutrons emitted nominally at 2.45 MeV from deuterium-deuterium fusion. This distribution will be used to extract the ion plasma temperature at the late stages of compression. An incident neutron flux of up to one billion neutrons per second is expected at the spectrometer, resulting in very demanding performance criteria. It is vital that the Fusion Demonstration Program’s prototype machine have a diagnostic system capable of measuring plasma ion temperatures of 10 keV (116 million degrees Celsius) to evaluate the success of a compression and the overall performance. Simulations modeling plasma compression, neutron interactions with the prototype’s apparatus and spectrometer, as well as the development of a prototype time-of-flight spectrometer in partnership with TRIUMF and Simon Fraser University, will be discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→