MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Characterization of a prototype detector unit for fast neutron imaging and spectrometry

2023· article· en· W4389666620 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScintillatorNeutron detectionOpticsDetectorNeutronPhysicsScintillationRecoilSilicon photomultiplierMaterials scienceNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neutron scatter camera, having wide field of view and spectral sensitivity, has been recent research efforts regarding passive fast neutron imaging technique. However, limited the sensitivity to special nuclear material (SUM) prevents it from practical applications. Recently reported Single Volume Scatter Camera (SVSC) [1-5] developed by Sandia National Laboratory demonstrated an order of magnitude increase in detection efficiency. We present a new design of single volume neutron scatter camera in order to improve the position resolution of n-p elastic scatters inside detector unit. The camera composes by ten layers of optically segmented plastic scintillator sheet. Each scintillator sheet consists of a plastic scintillator sheet of 10 cm × 10 cm × 1 cm dimensions and two groups (6×2) of wavelength-shifting fibers with orthogonal directions embedded into grooves on two opposite scintillator surfaces. Fiber scintillation signals were read out by silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs). A prototype detector unit has been characterized experimentally. Light output of the unidimensional six fiber channels from one side of the detector unit was calibrated to be 14.45 photoelectrons per MeVee. Position resolution of the detector unit was measured to be 0.35–0.44 times fiber pitch, corresponding to 5.48 mm for proton recoil energy interval of 1.63–2.60 MeV, and 4.60 mm for proton recoil energy interval of 4.82–5.50 MeV. Energy threshold for recoil proton localization was estimated to be 1.18 MeV. The potential performance optimization methods include reducing light signal loss by increasing the fiber diameter and decreasing the number of channels involved in position reconstruction by narrowing the scintillation signal distribution function of the detector unit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207