MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ego-Noise Reduction of a Mobile Robot Using Noise Spatial Covariance Matrix Learning and Minimum Variance Distortionless Response

2023· article· en· W4389667526 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre-Olivier Lagacé, François Ferland, François Grondin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNoise (video)Noise reductionMicrophoneArtificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionCovariance matrixRobotMinimum-variance unbiased estimatorPrincipal component analysisPattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmMathematicsMean squared errorStatisticsImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The performance of speech and events recognition systems significantly improved recently thanks to deep learning methods. However, some of these tasks remain challenging when algorithms are deployed on robots due to the unseen mechanical noise and electrical interference generated by their actuators while training the neural networks. Ego-noise reduction as a preprocessing step therefore can help solve this issue when using pre-trained speech and event recognition algorithms on robots. In this paper, we propose a new method to reduce ego-noise using only a microphone array and less than two minute of noise recordings. Using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), the best covariance matrix candidate is selected from a dictionary created online during calibration and used with the Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) beamformer. Results show that the proposed method runs in real-time, improves the signal-to-distortion ratio (SDR) by up to 10 dB, decreases the word error rate (WER) by 55% in some cases and increases the Average Precision (AP) of event detection by up to 0.2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207