MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389675608 · doi:10.1353/nin.2023.a914840

Stanley Bleifeld’s Johnny Podres Pitching to Roy Campanella

2023· article· en· W4389675608 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Joseph Stanton

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt, Technology, and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt historyArtPoetryLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stanley Bleifeld's Johnny Podres Pitching to Roy Campanella Joseph Stanton (bio) Outside a window at the Hall of Fameyou can see, in all weathers,Johnny Podres hurling—with ferocity so completethat his body is bent passionately in serviceto the propulsion of a pitchwe cannot seebecause there isno ball in play. The Johnny Podres we have hereis a bronzed rendition,a statue of thatno-longer-alive Dodger,who is throwing to the great no-longer-alive catcher,Roy Campanella.There is a joyto these biographical bronzes,the most famous works of Stanley Bleifeld, a great,no-longer-alive sculptorwho sculpted passionatelyhis body bent to the task again and again down the years,famous now only for these playersand a Lone Sailor,sculpted for the Navy,as an allegorical isolato, [End Page 3] who represents the lonelinessof long service.Bleifeld has, beyond this,no Hall and only unsigned replicasfor Fame. [End Page 4] Joseph Stanton joseph stanton is a Professor Emeritus of Art History and American Studies at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. As an art historian, he has published widely on American artists and writers. He often collaborates with artists, playwrights, musicians, and other poets and occasionally teaches poetry-writing workshops, such as the "Starting with Art" workshops he has taught at the Honolulu Museum of Art and Poets House (New York City). Copyright © 2024 University of Nebraska Press

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNineSame topicArt, Technology, and CultureFrench-language works237,207