Introduction: New writing from Windham-Campbell Prize recipients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IntroductionNew writing from Windham-Campbell Prize recipients Michael Kelleher (bio) and Meghan O'Rourke In 1982, the poet Seamus Heaney delivered the commencement address at Fordham University. He sat on the stage in the pouring rain between two honorary degree recipients: Robert S. McNamara, former U.S. secretary of defense and an architect of the Vietnam War, and Jim Henson, creator of the Muppets. "I looked to either side of me," he told an audience later, "and I thought, well, between the puppeteer and the politician sits the poet." [End Page 5] The world of literature likewise sits adjacent to both the gravity of politics and the levity of puppets, as the writers in this special issue of The Yale Review demonstrate. In its pages, you will find new work by this year's recipients of the Windham-Campbell Prizes at Yale University—prizes that we at The Yale Review admire for elevating international work (in poetry, in drama, in fiction, in nonfiction) that pushes the boundaries of contemporary literature. Like Heaney, the Irish writer Darran Anderson animates what it was like to spend his childhood in a country torn by violence, raising crucial questions about the damage that colonial power inflicts on individual lives. Susan Williams, who has done extraordinary work on the West's covert war against African decolonization, builds on her earlier book Who Killed Hammarskjöld? (2011) with a piece that looks at recent developments in the investigation into the mysterious 1961 plane crash that killed the second secretary-general of the United Nations, Dag Hammarskjöld. Alexis Pauline Gumbs explores the influence of twentieth-century painter and educator Alma Thomas on her own work, thinking about how the art of puppetry can uniquely render the horrors of the Jim Crow South. The work here is not just thematically bold but also formally playful. Percival Everett's story "In Medias Res" begins—yes—in the middle; the result is a visceral reminder of the thrill of encountering stories that disarm us. The narrator of Jasmine Lee-Jones's dramatic monologue "black pain redux" lives in the painful gap between the two poles of IRL (in real life) and OAT (online all the time). In her story "Winner," Ling Ma's narrator haunts her old apartment, only to find that things are not as she imagined; the ordinary becomes alienating, as Ma uses tone to enact the slippages of identity in late capitalism. The Iñupiaq Inuit poet dg nanouk okpik, who spent her childhood living with an adoptive white family, offers poems that celebrate the icy landscapes of her ancestral home, punctuated with the cries of animals and tender plant life. In "The Emcee Inquisition," Dominique Morisseau channels characters whose verbal pyrotechnics evoke both the ravages of racism and misogyny and the vivifying power of Black joy. We have also [End Page 6] included an essay called "Why I Write" by Greil Marcus, whose keynote lecture at this year's Windham-Campbell Prizes festival was a rousing reminder of how mysterious yet precise writing can be. Between the politician and the puppeteer sits the poet—or sit the writers, in this case. We think you will find, as we have, that in this space that Heaney evoked are writers who shake us out of complacency and into new forms of attention. [End Page 7] Michael Kelleher michael kelleher is the program director of the Windham Campbell Prizes. Copyright © 2023 Yale University
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".