MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389675729 · doi:10.1353/tyr.2023.a914438

Introduction: New writing from Windham-Campbell Prize recipients

2023· article· en· W4389675729 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Kelleher, Meghan O’Rourke

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Yale Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicContemporary Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDramaPoetryPower (physics)PoliticsIrishPerformance artMedia studiesColonialismArt historyHistoryArtLiteratureLawSociologyPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionNew writing from Windham-Campbell Prize recipients Michael Kelleher (bio) and Meghan O'Rourke In 1982, the poet Seamus Heaney delivered the commencement address at Fordham University. He sat on the stage in the pouring rain between two honorary degree recipients: Robert S. McNamara, former U.S. secretary of defense and an architect of the Vietnam War, and Jim Henson, creator of the Muppets. "I looked to either side of me," he told an audience later, "and I thought, well, between the puppeteer and the politician sits the poet." [End Page 5] The world of literature likewise sits adjacent to both the gravity of politics and the levity of puppets, as the writers in this special issue of The Yale Review demonstrate. In its pages, you will find new work by this year's recipients of the Windham-Campbell Prizes at Yale University—prizes that we at The Yale Review admire for elevating international work (in poetry, in drama, in fiction, in nonfiction) that pushes the boundaries of contemporary literature. Like Heaney, the Irish writer Darran Anderson animates what it was like to spend his childhood in a country torn by violence, raising crucial questions about the damage that colonial power inflicts on individual lives. Susan Williams, who has done extraordinary work on the West's covert war against African decolonization, builds on her earlier book Who Killed Hammarskjöld? (2011) with a piece that looks at recent developments in the investigation into the mysterious 1961 plane crash that killed the second secretary-general of the United Nations, Dag Hammarskjöld. Alexis Pauline Gumbs explores the influence of twentieth-century painter and educator Alma Thomas on her own work, thinking about how the art of puppetry can uniquely render the horrors of the Jim Crow South. The work here is not just thematically bold but also formally playful. Percival Everett's story "In Medias Res" begins—yes—in the middle; the result is a visceral reminder of the thrill of encountering stories that disarm us. The narrator of Jasmine Lee-Jones's dramatic monologue "black pain redux" lives in the painful gap between the two poles of IRL (in real life) and OAT (online all the time). In her story "Winner," Ling Ma's narrator haunts her old apartment, only to find that things are not as she imagined; the ordinary becomes alienating, as Ma uses tone to enact the slippages of identity in late capitalism. The Iñupiaq Inuit poet dg nanouk okpik, who spent her childhood living with an adoptive white family, offers poems that celebrate the icy landscapes of her ancestral home, punctuated with the cries of animals and tender plant life. In "The Emcee Inquisition," Dominique Morisseau channels characters whose verbal pyrotechnics evoke both the ravages of racism and misogyny and the vivifying power of Black joy. We have also [End Page 6] included an essay called "Why I Write" by Greil Marcus, whose keynote lecture at this year's Windham-Campbell Prizes festival was a rousing reminder of how mysterious yet precise writing can be. Between the politician and the puppeteer sits the poet—or sit the writers, in this case. We think you will find, as we have, that in this space that Heaney evoked are writers who shake us out of complacency and into new forms of attention. [End Page 7] Michael Kelleher michael kelleher is the program director of the Windham Campbell Prizes. Copyright © 2023 Yale University

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Yale ReviewSame topicContemporary Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207