New assignments of Raman spectra of tetrahedra and the effects of electronegativity. II. Silicate glasses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our density functional theory calculations (by GAUSSIAN) on the Si4O104− moiety and Na4Si4O10 molecule reproduce the experimental Raman frequencies and relative intensities for the three A1 modes in the experimental Raman spectra of Na2Si2O5 and BaSi2O5 crystals and glasses. Taking the center of mass into consideration, accompanied by visualization using GaussView, these calculations provide a firm assignment of these three peaks: the 1060 cm−1 peak to the Si-NBO stretch (NBO = Si–O or Si–O–Na), the ∼600 cm−1 peak to the Si-BO stretch (BO = Si–O–Si), and the ∼500 cm−1 peak to the Si-BO-Si bend. Our GAUSSIAN calculations on modified “non-equilibrium” SiO44− tetrahedra, constrained to have the same Si–O bond lengths and O–Si–O bond angles as in the Si4O104− moiety, confirm the above-mentioned assignment and show reasonable agreement with the experimental Raman frequencies and relative intensities. We then examine the regular trends in the Si-NBO and Si-BO stretch frequencies for all Qn (n = 0–4) species in silicate glasses and crystals. The large systematic change in the differences between these frequencies (Δ1) is explained by electronic changes within the SiO4 tetrahedron. For example, the larger Δ1 for the Q3 tetrahedra than the Q2 tetrahedra is due to the changes in Si, BO, and NBO electron densities on the tetrahedral Si and O atoms, as measured by Si 2p and O 1s x-ray photoelectron spectra. This trend strongly suggests that the Si-BO stretch frequency for the Q4 species in v-SiO2 should be ∼500 cm−1, close to the A1 breathing mode frequency of 495 cm−1 for four membered rings previously assigned.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".