MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389722741 · doi:10.1190/image2023-3908286.1

Structural and time-lapse imaging through gas clouds via FWI at Eldfisk field, North Sea

2023· article· en· W4389722741 on OpenAlexaff
Zhengxue Li, Leila Bencherif-Soerensen, P.G. Folstad, Brian K. Macy, Simon Shaw, Baishali Roy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpansiveGeologyOverburdenGeophysical imagingInversion (geology)Remote sensingComputer scienceGeophysicsSeismologyTectonicsMining engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we address the persistent challenges of structural and time-lapse imaging within the Seismically Obscured Areas (SOAs) at Eldfisk field, North Sea. Despite numerous seismic programs, imaging efforts within SOAs at structures A and B continue to be hindered, primarily due to the presence of expansive, complex gas clouds in the overburden. To address this, we apply Full-Waveform Inversion (FWI) to 3D and 4D Ocean Bottom Node (OBN) data, aiming to enhance both structural and time-lapse imaging in these areas. Starting with a legacy velocity model, FWI is used as the main tool for model building, capturing detailed velocity changes associated with gas clouds. The refined model is then input into a Q (the quality factor)-compensated Reverse-Time Migration (Q-RTM) pseudo-gather-based imaging flow to generate significantly improved structural images in the SOAs. Additionally, our application of 4D FWI successfully uncovers time-lapse velocity changes that align with the injection and production history within the SOAs, which were not observed by traditional seismic-based 4D methods that require a good image.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques→French-language works237,207→