MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preface

2023· article· en· W4389723807 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPower Systems and Renewable Energy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattery (electricity)ChinaSummitState (computer science)Computer scienceBig dataEngineeringLibrary sciencePower (physics)Engineering managementPolitical scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2023 3 rd New Energy and Energy Storage System Control Summit Forum (NEESSC 2023) took place in Mianyang, China on 26 th to 28 th September 2023 (hybrid form).The aim of the Conference was to provide a platform for the exploration of both fundamental topics and new applications of research fields related to new energy and energy storage, bring different scientific communities together, and facilitate the contacts between science, technology and industry.Over 200 scholars from renowned institutions and universities worldwide, including UK, Denmark, Canada, and China, etc., attended the Conference.They convened to discuss the latest research findings and trends in fields related to new energy and energy storage, fostering international academic exchange and collaboration.It was a highly informative and globally oriented-academic event.The Conference agenda included 14 keynote speeches, as well as plenty of oral and poster presentations.Among the keynote speakers, Professor Hui Pang from Xi'an University of Science and Technology performed a dramatic speech on Advanced Battery Management System-Research on State Estimation and Temperature Monitoring Methods under Electrochemical Mechanism Modeling.According to the actual application requirements, he took the power battery as the research object, combining relevant experimental data and the Multiphysics simulation platform, and carried out the estimation of battery state of charge (SOC) and heat generation rate (HGR) of EVs based on the mechanism reconstruction model.And Professor Shunli Wang from Southwest University of Science and Technology, China shared with us his research on Intelligent Energy Storage -Battery Performance Testing and State Monitoring in New Energy & Energy Storage System.Starting from battery testing methods, he selected typical test data for analysis, and discussed battery condition monitoring strategies based on his team's research progress, so as to contribute to the development of smart energy storage.This Proceedings gathers papers from regular contributions of NEESSC 2023; each contribution submitted for

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Systems and Renewable EnergyFrench-language works237,207