Endonasal Endoscopic Optic Canal Decompression for Nontraumatic Optic Neuropathy: Long-Term Visual Outcomes in 36 Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The management of compressive optic neuropathy (CON) arising from nontraumatic compression of the optic nerve within the optic canal (OC) remains a topic of controversy. In this study, our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of endonasal endoscopic optic nerve decompression (EEOND). In addition, we conducted an analysis of prognostic factors that could potentially influence visual outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 2015 and December 2021, involving adult patients (age > 18) diagnosed with CON and treated with EEOND at our specialized skull base expert center. The study evaluated the impact of surgery on visual acuity (VA), mean deficit (MD), and foveal threshold (FT) of the visual field (VF). These parameters were assessed preoperatively and at 3- and 12-month postoperative follow-ups. The relationship between clinical variables and the differences in postoperative to preoperative VA, MD, and FT of the visual field was analyzed through univariate and multivariate approaches. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (38 eyes) were included, with a mean age of 52 (±12) years, and a female predominance (78%). The mean ophthalmologic follow-up duration was 38 (±32) months. At the 12-month follow-up, 39% of the patients exhibited a VA improvement of ≥0.2 LogMAR. Partial VF improvement (MD improvement ≥25%) was observed in 55% of the patients, whereas 19% experienced complete recovery. In multivariate analysis, the presence of a type 4 OC was identified as the sole negative prognostic factor for visual improvement (VA and VF) at 12 months. Six patients (17%) encountered minor surgical complications, all of which were managed conservatively and had no impact on visual outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that EEOND is a safe and effective procedure, even in cases of severe and long-lasting CON caused by nontraumatic compression of the optic nerve at the level of the OC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".