MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389729205 · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06947-z

Structures, functions and adaptations of the human LINE-1 ORF2 protein

2023· article· en· W4389729205 on OpenAlexaff
Eric T. Baldwin, Trevor van Eeuwen, David Hoyos, Arthur O. Zalevsky, Egor P. Tchesnokov, Roberto Sánchez, Bryant D. Miller, Luciano H. Di Stefano, Francesc X. Ruiz, Matthew Hancock, Esin Işik, Carlos Mendez‐Dorantes, Thomas Walpole, Charles E. Nichols, Paul Wan, Kirsi Riento, Rowan Halls-Kass, Martin Augustin, Alfred Lammens, A. Jestel, Paula Upla, Kera Xibinaku, Samantha Congreve, Maximiliaan Hennink, Kacper B. Rogala, A.M. Schneider, Jennifer E. Fairman, Shawn M. Christensen, Brian Desrosiers, Gregory S. Bisacchi, Oliver L. Saunders, Nafeeza Hafeez, Wenyan Miao, Rosana Kapeller, Dennis M. Zaller, Andrej Šali, Oliver Weichenrieder, Kathleen H. Burns, Matthias Götte, Michael P. Rout, Eddy Arnold, Benjamin D. Greenbaum, Donna L. Romero, John LaCava, Martin S. Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueNature · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCommon FundNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institute of General Medical SciencesUniversity of California, San FranciscoDana-Farber Cancer InstituteNational Institute on AgingNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesPharmaron
KeywordsRetrotransposonBiologyProcessivityRNAComputational biologyDNATranslation (biology)Structural biologyCell biologyDNA replicationGeneticsGenomeGeneMessenger RNATransposable element

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposon is an ancient genetic parasite that has written around one-third of the human genome through a ‘copy and paste’ mechanism catalysed by its multifunctional enzyme, open reading frame 2 protein (ORF2p)1. ORF2p reverse transcriptase (RT) and endonuclease activities have been implicated in the pathophysiology of cancer2,3, autoimmunity4,5 and ageing6,7, making ORF2p a potential therapeutic target. However, a lack of structural and mechanistic knowledge has hampered efforts to rationally exploit it. We report structures of the human ORF2p ‘core’ (residues 238–1061, including the RT domain) by X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy in several conformational states. Our analyses identified two previously undescribed folded domains, extensive contacts to RNA templates and associated adaptations that contribute to unique aspects of the L1 replication cycle. Computed integrative structural models of full-length ORF2p show a dynamic closed-ring conformation that appears to open during retrotransposition. We characterize ORF2p RT inhibition and reveal its underlying structural basis. Imaging and biochemistry show that non-canonical cytosolic ORF2p RT activity can produce RNA:DNA hybrids, activating innate immune signalling through cGAS/STING and resulting in interferon production6–8. In contrast to retroviral RTs, L1 RT is efficiently primed by short RNAs and hairpins, which probably explains cytosolic priming. Other biochemical activities including processivity, DNA-directed polymerization, non-templated base addition and template switching together allow us to propose a revised L1 insertion model. Finally, our evolutionary analysis demonstrates structural conservation between ORF2p and other RNA- and DNA-dependent polymerases. We therefore provide key mechanistic insights into L1 polymerization and insertion, shed light on the evolutionary history of L1 and enable rational drug development targeting L1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations123
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNatureSame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207