MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

288: IMPACT OF AN IV BICARBONATE SHORTAGE IN A SAMPLE OF ADULT ICUS: INTERRUPTED TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS

2023· article· en· W4389730603 on OpenAlexaffabout
Amanda Y. Leong, Andrea Soo, Andrew Bond, Danny J. Zuege, Sean M. Bagshaw, Daniel J. Niven

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEconomic shortageIntensive careSample (material)BicarbonateEmergency medicineIntensive care medicineInternal medicineChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Limited research exists to guide the use of sodium bicarbonate among adults admitted to ICUs. From June to October 2017, there was a global shortage of I.V. sodium bicarbonate. Institutions like ours enacted conservation measures during this time period. We assessed the effect of the 2017 shortage of I.V. sodium bicarbonate on the use of sodium bicarbonate, and the incidence of severe acidemia (pH ≥7.20), hyperkalemia (serum K ≥6 mmol/L), renal replacement therapy use, and ICU mortality. Methods: This was an interrupted time series analysis among adults admitted to ICUs in Alberta, Canada between June 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. The primary data source was eCritical, a population-based electronic health record and data registry for all Alberta ICUs. Individual patient data were aggregated and examined at the ICU-level per month. We included admissions with blood gas pH < 7.3 at any time during their ICU stay. The exposure was a bolus or infusion I.V. bicarbonate prescription. The primary outcome was the proportion of the sample treated with I.V. bicarbonate. Results: 19,293 admissions met inclusion criteria among 19 ICUs in 15 sites. The median age was 63 years (IQR 52 – 72 years), 36% were female, and median APACHE II was 23 (IQR 18 – 30). Among all admissions, 31% received bicarbonate in the pre-shortage period, 22% during the shortage and 29% post-shortage. Among patients with severe acidemia, 51% received bicarbonate pre-shortage, which fell to 41% during the shortage and was maintained at 41% post-shortage. Among patients with hyperkalemia, 45% received bicarbonate pre-shortage, which fell to 34% during the shortage, and rose to 45% post-shortage. The proportion of patients with severe acidemia was 42% pre-shortage, 42% during shortage, and 40% post-shortage. The proportion of patients with hyperkalemia was 15% pre-shortage, 16% during shortage, and 17% post-shortage. The proportion of patients requiring renal replacement therapy was 16% pre-shortage, 17% during shortage, and 16% post-shortage. There was no difference in ICU mortality. Conclusions: The I.V. sodium bicarbonate shortage was associated with its reduced administration, including among patients with severe acidemia and hyperkalemia, two conditions where sodium bicarbonate administration is a common practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care MedicineSame topicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersFrench-language works237,207