MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

960: OPIOID AND SEDATIVE WEANING AND WITHDRAWAL IN MECHANICALLY VENTILATED ADULTS: AN ALERT-ICU SUBSTUDY

2023· article· en· W4389731441 on OpenAlexaff
Scott Bolesta, Lisa Burry, Marc M. Perreault, Céline Gélinas, Kathryn Smith, Federico Carini, Rebekah Eadie, Richard R. Riker, Brian L. Erstad

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSedativeWeaningAnesthesiaOpioidEmergency medicineIntensive care medicineInternal medicineReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (IWS) occurs with prolonged use and high doses of opioids and sedatives, and weaning through gradual dose reductions may minimize the risk of IWS. This study examined opioid and sedative weaning and IWS policies/protocols in critically ill adults receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). We hypothesized that opioid and sedative weaning and IWS policies/protocols are underutilized in this population. Methods: This was a post-hoc analysis of an international, observational, point prevalence study on a single date between June 1 and September 30, 2021. Enrollment criteria were ICU patients 18 years or older on invasive MV who received parenteral opioids or sedatives in the past 24 hours. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had parenteral opioids and/or sedatives weaned by an institutional policy/protocol. Parametric and nonparametric statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 28.0.0 (Armonk, New York) according to the level of measurement, data distribution, and assumptions. The a priori alpha was 5%. Results: There were 2402 patients screened for enrollment at 87 hospitals in 229 ICUs from 11 countries, of which 1066 were enrolled. Most patients (50%) were from the US, with a mean age of 55 (SD ± 16) years. Females accounted for 38%, 50% were admitted for respiratory disease, and 37% tested PCR positive for COVID-19. The median ICU stay was 7 (IQR, 3-16) days, and 40% of patients developed ARDS. The median duration of MV was 4.6 (IQR, 1.4-11.5) days. Opioids were administered to 938 (88%), sedatives to 932 (87%), and their combination to 804 (75%) patients. Among enrolled patients, 35% were admitted to 90 ICUs with a weaning protocol, while 6% were admitted to 23 ICUs with a withdrawal protocol. By the day of data collection, 39% of patients used a weaning protocol for analgesia-sedation, while 12% used a withdrawal protocol in ICUs with such protocols. Conclusions: Opioid and sedative weaning and IWS policies/protocols are underutilized in the ICU, as only a small proportion of patients had one implemented by the data collection day. About one-third of patients were admitted to an ICU with a weaning protocol, and about 1 in 17 to an ICU with a withdrawal protocol.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care Medicine→Same topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders→French-language works237,207→