Cardiac MRI and Clinical Outcomes in <i>TMEM43</i> Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy is an inherited cardiomyopathy that can involve both ventricles. Several genes have been identified as pathogenic in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, including TMEM43. However, there are limited data on cardiac MRI findings in patients with TMEM43 variants to date. In this case series, cardiac MRI findings and clinical outcomes are described in 14 patients with TMEM43 variants, including eight (57%) with the pathogenic p.Ser358Leu variant (six female patients; mean age, 33 years ± 15 [SD]) and six (43%) with a TMEM43 variant of unknown significance (three female patients; mean age, 38 years ± 11). MRI findings demonstrated left ventricular systolic dysfunction in eight (57%) patients and right ventricular dysfunction in four (29%) patients. Among the nine patients with late gadolinium enhancement imaging, left ventricular late gadolinium enhancement was present in seven (78%; all subepicardial) patients. In summary, TMEM43 variants are associated with high prevalence of subepicardial late gadolinium enhancement and left ventricular dysfunction. Keywords: Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy, Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy, TMEM43, Cardiac MRI, Genetic Variants Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".