Specific Ventilation in Severe Asthma Evaluated with Noncontrast Tidal Breathing <sup>1</sup>H MRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose To determine if proton (1H) MRI–derived specific ventilation is responsive to bronchodilator (BD) therapy and associated with clinical biomarkers of type 2 airway inflammation and airways dysfunction in severe asthma. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, 27 participants with severe asthma (mean age, 52 years ± 9 [SD]; 17 female, 10 male) and seven healthy controls (mean age, 47 years ± 16; five female, two male), recruited between 2018 and 2021, underwent same-day spirometry, respiratory oscillometry, and tidal breathing 1H MRI. Participants with severe asthma underwent all assessments before and after BD therapy, and type 2 airway inflammatory biomarkers were determined (blood eosinophil count, sputum eosinophil percentage, sputum eosinophil-free granules, and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide) to generate a cumulative type 2 biomarker score. Specific ventilation was derived from tidal breathing 1H MRI and its response to BD therapy, and relationships with biomarkers of type 2 airway inflammation and airway dysfunction were evaluated. Results Mean MRI specific ventilation improved with BD inhalation (from 0.07 ± 0.04 to 0.11 ± 0.04, P < .001). Post-BD MRI specific ventilation (P = .046) and post-BD change in MRI specific ventilation (P = .006) were greater in participants with asthma with type 2 low biomarkers compared with participants with type 2 high biomarkers of airway inflammation. Post-BD change in MRI specific ventilation was correlated with change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (r = 0.40, P = .04), resistance at 5 Hz (r = -0.50, P = .01), resistance at 19 Hz (r = -0.42, P = .01), reactance area (r = -0.54, P < .01), and reactance at 5 Hz (r = 0.48, P = .01). Conclusion Specific ventilation evaluated with tidal breathing 1H MRI was responsive to BD therapy and was associated with clinical biomarkers of airways disease in participants with severe asthma. Keywords: MRI, Severe Asthma, Ventilation, Type 2 Inflammation Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023 See also the commentary by Moore and Chandarana in this issue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".