MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389733903 · doi:10.22323/1.449.0528

Development of the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Readout Electronics for the HL-LHC

2023· article· en· W4389733903 on OpenAlexaff
M. J. Shroff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFirmwareLarge Hadron ColliderElectronicsDetectorComputer hardwareCalibrationCalorimeter (particle physics)Atlas (anatomy)Data acquisitionPhysicsComputer scienceElectrical engineeringEmbedded systemNuclear physicsEngineeringOpticsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new era of hadron collisions will start around 2029 with the High-Luminosity LHC which is designed to collect ten times more data than what has been collected during 10 years of operation at LHC. This will be achieved by higher instantaneous luminosity at the price of a higher number of collisions per bunch crossing. In order to withstand the high expected radiation doses and the harsher data taking conditions, the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter readout electronics is being upgraded. The electronic readout chain is composed of four main components. 1) New front-end boards will amplify, shape, and digitise the calorimeter’s ionisation signal using two gains over a dynamic range of 16 bits and 11 bit precision. 2) New calibration boards will provide precise calibration of all 182468 channels of the calorimeter over a 16 bit dynamic range. 3) New ATCA compliant signal processing boards (“LASP”) will receive the detector data at 40 MHz, where FPGAs connected through lpGBT high-speed links will perform energy and time reconstruction. In total, the off-detector electronics receive 345 Tbps of data via 33000 links at 10 Gbps. For the first time, online machine learning techniques are being considered for use in these FPGAs. A subset of the original data is sent with low latency to the hardware trigger system, while the full data are buffered until receiving of trigger accept signals. The latest status of the development of the board and the firmware is shown. 4) A new timing and control system, “LATS”, will synchronise the aforementioned components. Its current design status will also be shown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParticle Detector Development and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207